domingo, 27 de enero de 2019

Religión y Fe


Religión y Fe



Por favor, no os engañéis, cualquiera que fuere tu llamada fe o religión, Dios te sigue mandando LO MISMO, Dios no exime ni excusa a nadie de obedecer alguna o algunas verdades por estar en alguna religión o profesar alguna fe. La palabra de Dios juzga (Juan 12:48), discierne (del griego κριτικος-kritikos) los pensamientos y las intenciones del corazón. Hebreos 4:12
La verdad de Dios es para todo hombre en todo lugar. Hechos 17:30-31 No hay eso de libertad de expresión, Dios manda hablar lo que Él dice (1 Pedro 4:11) y manda a todos hablar esa misma cosa, la verdad. 1 Corintios 1:10 Rechazar, ignorar y oponerse a la verdad es auto destructivo. Romanos 1:18; 2:3
así que, los que piensan que alguna palabra de Cristo no es para ellos, por ser de cierta religión o fe, ¡se engañan a sí mismos!

Recuerde: La verdad no respeta la mentira, al contrario, la condena.

martes, 15 de enero de 2019

IS GOD AGAINST GOD?




Bound by God’s Inspired and Universal Law

As soon as we place our trust in human’s non-inspired words and not IN God’s inspired words, we are no longer walking by faith.

Most people profess to believe that marriage is a divine institution, but it is only their professed understanding, because they deny it in practice. God has one inspired law regarding marriage that is applicable to all mankind of all time and in all countries and civilizations, so all christians can obey 1 Corinthians 1:10. No doctrine of Christ differs from time to time or culture to culture. Civil law ignores and despises God’s decree on marriage in Genesis 2:24 and proclaims that people are married before and without complying with this truth, Acts 5:29. Believing that civil marriage (evolving human procedure) is the divine institution found in Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:4-6, evidences a lack of faith in the scriptures.

Does unlimited authority reside in the community or society? 1 Peter 4:11; Matthew 28:18;1 Corinthians 11:3 Who established Christ’s authority? Whose decree is found in Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:4-6 Did God authorize any man in any society or government to change or redefine the God- inspired what and how found in Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:4-6 and 1 Corinthians 7:2? So, is marriage a divine institution? Notice, I did not say civil marriage, (the man-made procedure that ignores and despises the word of God). The church is a divine institution, God built it and revealed, from the beginning, the how to enter or be added to the church, it was explicitly regulated by God; likewise, marriage is a divine institution, and God established by decree the how two become one flesh, it was explicitly regulated by God. 1 Corinthians 6:16; 7:2; Matthew 19:5

Approved marriage and approved putting away coincide with God’s joining (binding) and releasing one. Marrying a put away coincides with commits adultery.   

Can we marry and put away against God’s authority (via his inspired word)? And it is real, no problem. How can we marry against God’s authority (via his inspired word)?

Living together with the intent or commitment to be one flesh for life without both being single is against God’s authority via his inspired word (leave father and mother implies they are single). God does no joining here, not due to the absence of any civil law protocol, but because of the individuals involved, they are not authorized (own man- own woman, not another’s) 1Corinthians 7:2. There is no binding without compliance with inspired conditions, even if you add a million human law protocols, it remains “πορνεια”, by what law? Civil law? NO, but by the inspired law of Christ. “πορνειαhas nothing whatsoever to do with subjection to civil laws, “πορνεια” IS NOT INSUBORDINATION TO Romans 131-5, they can live in peace and sweet harmony forever (most people think this is a blessing, apparent dignity). Do you believe that Herod and Herodias and the other fornicator of 1 Corinthians 5 were guilty of insubordination to civil authorities or laws?

How can we put away against God’s authority (via his inspired word)?

Sundering the physical relationship without the cause of fornication.  God does no loosing here, not due to the absence of any civil law protocol, but because of the absence of the cause. There is no releasing without compliance with inspired conditions, even if you add a million human law protocols, as soon as the physical relation is sundered, there is sin, the putting away has already occurred, there is no second putting away after the physical marriage has ended, no post-civil law procedure can make “legal” an illegal (sinful) action in nature.

So, the binding and the loosing is done via God’s inspired, living and active law (when conditions are met) NOT via any pre or post ever- evolving national protocol.

Assuming you really believe that civil laws are God’s will and that man can marry and sunder a marriage against God’s will, the irrefutable conclusion is that man can marry and sunder a marriage against civil laws.

Can we marry and put away against God’s authority (via civil government)? And it is real, no problem! How can we marry against God’s authority (via civil government)?

­­­­­­­­­­____________________________________________________________________________________.

How can we put away against God’s authority (via civil government)?

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­____________________________________________________________________________________.



How do you decide which illegal relationships are marriages and which ones are not?

martes, 8 de enero de 2019

Mental marriage and Mental divorce


Your doctrine on marriage and divorce is self-defeating and highly inconsistent.



Most people profess to believe that marriage is a divine institution, but it is only their professed understanding, because they deny it in practice. First, there is no scriptural record or history of “MARRIAGE OFFICIANTS”. God instituted marriage and many like to say that civil governments redefined and re-instituted marriage. So we have two God instituted entities, which one was first, governments or the universal God inspired procedure recorded in Genesis 2:24? Would anyone reasonably affirm that the procedure did not exist before civil governments? God has one inspired law regarding marriage that is applicable to all mankind of all time and in all countries and civilizations, so all christians can obey 1 Corinthians 1:10. No doctrine of Christ differs from time to time or culture to culture.

On the other hand, most people erroneously apply Genesis 2:24 retroactively to Adam and Eve’s marriage, when it is evident that they did not have a biological father and mother to leave and they were not under the God given regulation of becoming one flesh in sexual intercourse, THEY WERE ALREADY ONE FLESH, “This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh”, God is wise!

So, Genesis set the criteria for “a man” thereafter to enter in the God given marriage covenant. So, the question is: what is happening when a man leaves his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife; and the two shall become one flesh? THEY ARE MARRYING! Then God the Son assures us of those who obey or go through this divine and inspired declaration that “ they are no longer two, but one. God has joined them together, so no one should separate them.” Who joined them together? When did God join them? How did God join them? Through what agency? God’s inspired law, the same law that binds a woman to her husband while he is living, the only law that says she is guilty of adultery if she becomes one with another while her husband is living. Romans 7:2; 1 Corinthians 7:39:Ephesians 5:24

Civil law marriage (human non-inspired procedure) exists before and without the factual marriage God revealed in Genesis 2:24, God has joined nothing at that point, they are not ONE FLESH IN ANY SENSE, they are not married as revealed in the scripture ( I call it mental marriage). Anyone who separates the marrying from the sex or becoming one flesh, is arguing for a couple being able to live in adultery without a single act of physical intercourse. God said that marriage is “two becoming one flesh”; civil marriage procedure ignores, despises and is against revelation when it excludes “becoming one flesh” as denominational plan of salvation is against and ignores and despises God’s revealed plan of salvation when it excludes baptism.

Reason for yourself!

Is is pure nonsense to say that marriage and putting away exist without God’s approval and at the same time say that marriage and putting away cannot exist without the State approval. it is nonsense to say that you can marry or put away ignoring God’s revealed words and at the same time say that you cannot marry or put away without the state sanction.. There is no legal way to do something illegal or should I say there is no legal procedure to sin, there is no legal procedure to break God’s law, that is self contradictory and self defeating. 1 John 3:4 “ Everyone who sins breaks God's law, because sin is the same as breaking God's law.”

Civil law ignores God’s decree on marriage in Genesis 2:24 and proclaims people are married before and without complying with this truth. Acts 5:29
to believe that civil marriage is a divine institution evidences a lack of faith in Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:4-6


They call it marriage and divorce.

They call it MARRIAGE and DIVORCE, something that can be done ONLY VIA CIVIL GOVERNMENTS. And they are right, because marriage (the divine institution) happily existed before governments, man made laws and procedures.
Marriage (the divine institution) existed before marriage officiants, before the existence of paper, civil governments, before the Jews, before the church, and God himself in the flesh confirmed and ratified what marriage is and ever was in Matthew 19:4-6

They call it MARRIAGE, even if it is unapproved and not according to Christ’s inspired law. Can we call it marriage, even if it is not according to “Christ” uninspired law via civil governments? Absolutely!
Can we marry and put away against God’s authority(via his inspired word)? And it is real, no problem.

Can we marry and put away against God’s authority (via civil government)? And it is real, no problem!

There is no legal procedure to break God’s law( to commit sin, illegality 1 John 3:4 ), God nowhere authorized anyone to break his law(sin, put away) via any exclusive procedure or agent.

It is self defeating and contradictory to conclude that we have to obey God(via civil laws) to live in adultery against God’s will. Obey God to sin against God is not Christ’s doctrine. Is God against God?

I call it “mental separation,” because it involves something that happens AFTER the actual separation(sin) has occurred. When do you believe the actual sin occurs when they suspend sexual duties and cohabitation or when the paper works are finished? When lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death. 1Corinthians 7:3-5 So, if there is already sin when one party departs, is there another sin when paper works are finished? What sin is that, if separation, the actual putting away has already occurred? 1Corinthians 7:10-11 The putting away ALWAYS occurs before the paperwork, unless the couple agrees to live happily as on honey moon season, only until the paperwork process is over, and of course, they do not sin if they reconcile before o without paperwork.

There is no white lie, all lies are harmful and of the devil. Why should I believe or pretend to believe a lie? As soon as we place our trust in human’s non-inspired words and not IN God’s inspired words, we are no longer walking by faith.

Can Man Sunder A Marriage Against God’s Will?
Can God sunder a civil marriage against State law?

lunes, 7 de enero de 2019

Cambio de Ley


Cambio de ley, Y leyes inválidas

Romanos 7:1-4; Colosenses 2:14-16

Dios no cambia, pero sí cambió sus leyes. Hebreos 7:12
 

Dios añade a los salvos a la iglesia, los traslada al reino, pero ¿cómo saber cuándo Dios me añade o me traslada?   ¿Hay alguna persona APARTE DE DIOS MISMO, que pueda asegurarme que Dios me añadió a la iglesia o me trasladó al reino de su amado Hijo? Hechos 2:47; Colosenses 1:13; Romanos 8:16 Solo Dios puede darme absoluta certeza de que ya fui añadido a la iglesia o trasladado al reino. Dios es quien planeó la salvación y Dios revela en el evangelio cómo funciona el plan, cada quien decide confiar en Dios o confiar en el hombre. Romanos 1:17; 3:21-26
 EVIDENCIAS QUE SE PUEDEN VER Y LEER EN LAS ESCRITURAS
 

Los judíos rebeldes seguían ofreciendo culto a Dios según el primer pacto, ofreciendo sacrificios de animales (Hebreos 8:4), aunque ese pacto ya no era válido según el plan de Dios. ¿Seguían el plan o la voluntad de Dios? Efesios 2:14-16; Romanos 10:3 el sacrificio de animales perdió autoridad o vigencia EN LA CRUZ DE JESÚS.  

La circuncisión ya no tiene autoridad, Dios condenó a los que imponían esta práctica como ordenanza de culto. En Gálatas 5:3 Dios revela sin duda alguna que el que se circuncida estaba bajo obligación de guardar toda la ley Romanos 3:10; 3:19. El primer pacto era para personas circuncidadas, no para incircuncisos.  Éxodos 12:43-48 La circuncisión perdió autoridad o vigencia EN LA CRUZ DE JESÚS.

El que viola la ley de Moisés muera irremisiblemente. Hebreos 10:28 ¿Es voluntad de Dios hoy matar a los que violan la ley de Moisés? Todo eso perdió autoridad o vigencia en la cruz de Jesús.   

Dios mandó el bautismo de Juan (era de Dios), pero hubo algunos que se bautizaron en el bautismo de JUAN cuando ya no era válido, ya no tenía autoridad de Dios, ya no era voluntad de Dios (Hechos 19:1-6). ¿Recibieron perdón de pecados con el bautismo de Juan? NO. No habían recibido ni perdón, ni el don del Espíritu Santo; tenían que ser bautizados en el nombre de Jesús, bautismo que es para perdón de pecados y para recibir el don del Espíritu Santo.  EL BAUTISMO DE JUAN PERDIÓ AUTORIDAD O VIGENCIA EN LA CRUZ DE JESÚS. ahora el bautismo que tiene la autoridad es el bautismo en el nombre de Jesús, el bautismo que Jesús mandó, mandamiento y ley del nuevo pacto, (Hechos 2:38; Mateo 28:18-20; Marcos 16:16). No es posible hacer en el nombre de Jesús lo que Jesús no autorizó ni mandó.

LA SANGRE DEL NUEVO PACTO

Hubo un primer pacto instituido con sangre de animales. Éxodos 24:7 “libro del pacto” pertenece al primer pacto; Éxodos 34:28 “y escribió en tablas las palabras del pacto, los diez mandamientos”, pertenecen al primer pacto; Deuteronomio 4:13; 9:9-11 “las dos tablas de piedra, las tablas del pacto”, pertenecen al primer pacto o antiguo testamento “el ministerio de muerte grabado con letras en piedra”, 2da Corintios 3:7, 14-15. Este primer pacto o ley incluía ordenanzas de culto (Hebreos 9:1) como la circuncisión, el sacrificio de animales, días de reposo y los diezmos (Hebreos 7: 5; Números 18:26-32), quemar incienso (Números 16:39-40; 2 Crónicas 26:16-20) tocar instrumentos de música al alabar (2 Crónicas 29:25-30), la pascua, y hasta los mandamientos pequeños.

Jesús nació y vivió bajo la ley (Gálatas 4:4; Lucas 2:22-24, 39), ley que solo autorizaba sacerdotes de la tribu de Leví y Jesús descendió de la tribu de Judá (Hebreos 7:11,14); solamente quitando la ley o primer pacto pudo Jesús llegar a ser Sumo sacerdote bajo un nuevo pacto (Hebreos 3:1; 8:1; 9:24). Ahora mismo es SUMO SACERDOTE, y todo cristiano verdadero es un sacerdote de Dios (Hebreos 6:20; 1era Pedro 2:5,9), eso era imposible cuando el primer pacto estaba vigente. Números 3:10; 16:40 No es racional o razonable aceptar que Cristo es Sumo sacerdote ahora y pensar e insistir en que está vigente el primer pacto, que autorizaba únicamente sacerdotes levíticos. Ya hubo cambio de sacerdocio y cambio de ley. Hebreos 7:12 Sin el sacerdocio levítico, no hay nadie autorizado por Dios para oficiar ordenanzas de culto del primer pacto, Hebreos 9:1,6.  ¿Cuándo y dónde perdió autoridad o vigencia toda la ley, el primer pacto completo, (hasta el  mandamiento más pequeño)? OCURRIÓ EN LA CRUZ DE JESÚS.  

Toda la ley o primer pacto tenía autoridad, hasta los mandamientos muy pequeños, todo estaba vigente ANTES De LA MUERTE DE CRISTO, “De manera que cualquiera que quebrantare uno de estos mandamientos muy pequeños, y así enseñare a los hombres, muy pequeño será llamado en el reino de los cielos…” (Mateo 5:19) ¿Cree usted que ya podemos quebrantar UNO y enseñar a los hombres a hacer lo mismo sin pecar?   

después de su muerte en la cruz, a Cristo le fue dada toda autoridad en el cielo y en la tierra. La muerte de Cristo confirmó, dio validez, vigencia o autoridad al nuevo pacto o testamento, la ley de Cristo, (leyes no válidas mientras Jesús vivía Hebreos 9:17, no estaban escritas); pero su muerte también abolió o quitó autoridad al primer pacto (las leyes vigentes que ya existían antes de su muerte, leyes que Dios dio por medio de Moisés (Juan 1:17) todas las leyes recibidas bajo el sacerdocio levítico. (Hebreos 7:11) y él dijo “Enseñándoles que guarden todas las cosas que os he mandado”. Mateo 28:20 Pecado es infracción de la ley (1 Juan 3:4). Nadie infringe hoy la ley o primer pacto porque nadie está bajo esa ley. Romanos 6:14-15; 3:19 ¿Con qué autoridad o en qué nombre practican y mandan guardar ordenanzas de culto del primer pacto? Algo es seguro, NO ES EN EL NOMBRE DE JESÚS (no es su doctrina).   No aparece, no existe en las escrituras cristianos practicando ordenanzas de culto que solamente a los sacerdotes y levitas autorizó Dios realizar, un cristiano no diezma, no se circuncida, no sacrifica animales ni celebra la pascua, no guarda días de reposo, no toca instrumentos musicales al alabar ni quema incienso, eso no es cristianismo, no es voluntad de Dios. 

¿Por qué piensas que eres miembro de la iglesia que está sujeta a Cristo, si defiendes y practicas lo que Cristo (la cabeza) no mandó ni autorizó a la iglesia (su cuerpo) sino a levitas y sacerdotes según el orden de Aarón?

MUCHOS CREEN LA MENTIRA Y LUEGO SE SIENTEN OBLIGADOS A DEFENDER LA MENTIRA QUE ESCOGIERON CREER.